previously on this list Giancarlo Razzolini contributed:
> > What gives LibreSSL more credibility? There's almost nothing new or
> > innovative in it; it's just a cleaned up copy of OpenSSL.
> You should do your homework.
Too right, also those previous two lines showed he has no clue about
real security and what has proven to work and what has proven
exploitable in the past.
It's just cleaner so why is it more credible??
Also OpenBSD is focussing on what actually matters and are unrestricted
in that aim and so I see LibreSSl leaving OpenSSL in the dust and would
use that for my companies products out of the two. Emergency updating is
unneeded expense especially if an UNUSED feature is to blame.
--
_______________________________________________________________________
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface'
(Doug McIlroy)
In Other Words - Don't design like polkit or systemd
_______________________________________________________________________
