On 23/11/13 04:20, Jason Barbier wrote: > > On 11/22/2013 10:50 AM, Rick Pettit wrote: >> Lewis, >> >> If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself. >> >> What you are asking for here is offensive. >> >> -Rick > +1 +1
>> >> On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro <paol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 "J. Lewis Muir" <jlm...@imca-cat.org> ha scritto: >>>> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: >>>>> If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with >>>>> the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life >>>>> happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May, and 1st >>>>> of November, every year. >>>> Hi, Giancarlo. >>>> >>>> Well, no one wants to maintain a patch forever. I'd maintain it for a >>>> while if there was a good chance it would get accepted at some point, >>>> but if there's no chance, then I wouldn't bother. >>>> >>>> I'm a little puzzled over the whole resistance to the patch. If I >>>> wrote a man page for some software I wrote, and if an example in it was >>>> considered off-color by someone, and that someone submitted a patch to >>>> me to change it slightly to no longer be off-color to them, and they >>>> asked in a kind way, and the patch didn't hurt the clarity of the man >>>> page in any way, I would likely accept the patch. How am I hurt by it? >>>> I may not agree with the person, but why would I insist on keeping an >>>> example that seems off-color to them? If it's somehow offensive to them >>>> and can be changed in a small way not to be, then I would accept the >>>> patch to change it. Everybody wins--no big deal. >>>> >>>> Lewis >>> +1
