Not_sure_if_trolling_or_plain_schizo.jpg
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:01:45AM -0700, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> Excuse the Yahoo address.  That's the best I can do here in the United States
> of Amerikkka.  How is life in OpenBSD-land?  The gummint dont trust me when
> I use OpenBSD because they don't have a clue what I'm doing when I'm at my
> computer.  Even after they've read my code, and obtained all my passwords via
> rubber-hose cryptanalysis, and they're sitting at my keyboard staring at the 
> hash
> prompt, they still don't have a clue what I am doing, and they think the 
> problem
> can be solved by the more liberal use of rubber hoses.
>  
> Oh, I was writing a letter to my attorney.  But some people consider that to 
> be
> illegal here in Amerikkka.
>  
> They don't understand that when I am ready to release my software, I release 
> it,
> and when it's released, it's released.  That is my right under our First 
> Amendment
> guarantee of freedom of speech and of the press.  I think it works pretty 
> similarly
> over there in Canada.  When you've tested your code and you are ready, you
> commit it, and when it's committed, it's committed, and the rest of the team 
> is
> free to tear it to shreds.
>  
> The best defense to rubber-hose cryptanalysis is small pieces of lead, saboted
> and silenced and projected at high speed at anyone and everyone armed with a
> rubber hose.  The Penguins over in Linux-land understand this very well.  Do 
> the
> Pufferfish?  Because that's my right, too, under our Second Amendment
> guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms.
>  
> So when I'm ready, I fire a shot, and when it's fired, it's fired, and there 
> is no
> calling it back.  And that's why I make dead certain that I am ready before I 
> fire.
>  
> Even if the U.S. Department of Defense considers computer cryptography to be a
> munition of war, then the right to use it is still protected, only under the 
> Second
> Amendment rather than the First.  Some communications are private, 
> confidential,
> classified, or privileged and not obtainable with a warrant, and that is why 
> we use
> cryptography here in the United States of America.

Reply via email to