>Everytime you follow a non official documentation, you waste your time >and the developer's time, we're not cranky about "calomel" only, we're >cranky about people following unofficial documentation, remember, our >FAQ and manpages are accurate 99.99% of the time and they are pretty >well written and complete.
90% of the time the problem is finding the right man page. F.ex. the FAQ starts with pppoe(8) which leads to the gigantic ppp(8) and you're shit out of luck if you read all those only to find out pppoe(4) is what you really want. >If you can't figure it out by reading the FAQ/manpages: you're either >not ready for it, or we have a documentation bug. "Not ready" as in "young Skywalker?" That's bullshit; Google's pagerank means more people are linking to Calomel, period. If googling a problem is considered "crass" or "lazy" then remove google site search from openbsd.org. Remove grep while you're at it, let newbies earn their OpenBSD creds by reading source code. What is this, a fucking fraternity? You've got a bug alright: Calomel keeps on popping up despite being wrong, its site designed by a flaming unicorn, scripts made mostly of ASCII-art and useless comments to reinforce the genius of its egomaniacal self-jizz-gobbling writer -- and the conclusion is that the problem lies with that site, or people being stupid, lazy or "not ready". -- p
