The web site in question is very nice site and it's for one of the more prosperous Mexican states, i.e. a government website. Weren't you the one that recently posted that in I.T. one has to deal with what one is given? This includes personnel, no ?
I only hope people like you don't scare off the Mexican government from allowing themselves to be affiliated with OpenBSD by withdrawing their endorsement from the http://www.openbsd.org/users.html page. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Tomas Bodzar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:22:38 -0700 > >> "Carlos A. Garcia G." B wrote: > >> > >>> ok ill try to find out how to puch the webmaster so he change his mind, > >>> let me get the info from the webmaster. > >>> the only reason he said its "Frontpage have a marvelous tools and with > >>> my frontpage i can upload the website without messing the ftp" > >>> hummm! > > Only people which use and love Frontpage are people which are doing > similar pages with Frontpage http://www.700200.cz/ > > In short people for which it will be good idea to deny access at all > for www or anything from IT :-) It's better to fire those people from > company instead of trying to find ways around for their crap. > > >> > >> See what he thinks of sftp (it is ssh not secure ftp making it > >> reliable, secure and silky smooth) with filezilla or gftp and never > >> look back. > >> > >> Dreamweaver supports sftp but only password based auth as far as the > >> latest version I've seen. > > > > The WWW consortium's tool, Amaya, also works quite well to avoid > > FrontPage's limitations. And it actually follows the standards for > > HTML encoding, correctly handling relative URL's, creating far more > > reliable and compatible web pages than Microsoft's tools. > > > > If the last avaiable version of FrontPage still supports it, and for > > many other tools which *do* support it such as the World Wide Web > > consortium's tool "Amaya", WebDAV is a much, much better protocol than > > FTP. It uses HTTP or preferably HTTPS, it's built into core UNIX and > > Linux system tools such as Subversion so it's well supported, it > > doesn't have the split data and command channel problems that FTP has > > always had at firewalls, and no one blocks outgoing HTTPS at their > > firewalls in environments where the web must be accessible. Many sites > > very casually block the SSH port 22 that SFTP uses (to my occasional > > regret, and often so that the proxy servers or intervening network > > tools can monitor user's traffic for content). > > > > I've helped several companies migrate from FTP to WebDAV over HTTPS > > with good success and excellent reliability. Is this open to you?
