On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:42:53AM -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote: > On 8/28/2011 10:50 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > >> (and main link which caused that > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html) > > > > This link makes me a little sad. I don't quite get why that guy mentions > > that FreeBSD ports has problems, but then mentions only the netbsd work, > > and blatantly ignores our tools, even though they solve most of the problems > > he has... > > They would have to reintroduce Perl into base in order to borrow any code > from OpenBSD ports, though. If there was will to do that, they probably > wouldn't have taken Perl out in the first place.
It looks a bit like "lalala, I can't hear you". At least a mention of why he doesn't consider OpenBSD pkg_add would be honest...
