* Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050526 14:53]:
> for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Ouch ;-)  for x in `jot 24 1` is better I think ;-)

Reply via email to