On 26 May 2005, at 18:27, Oliver J. Morais wrote:

* Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050526 17:31]:
Ouch ;-)  for x in `jot 24 1` is better I think ;-)
I tried to use seq, but it wasn't there.  Quick to write the numbers
than search the man page...

/usr/ports/misc/sh-utils  if you want (g)seq, but jot is fine.

So, why is there no seq in OpenBSD? I can see that jot fills the gap nicely, and I presume it takes the functionality of some other old gnu apps also?

--
Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://weblog.vanhegan.net

Reply via email to