On 26 May 2005, at 16:00, Oliver J. Morais wrote:

* Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050526 14:53]:
for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Ouch ;-)  for x in `jot 24 1` is better I think ;-)

I tried to use seq, but it wasn't there. Quick to write the numbers than search the man page...

--
Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://weblog.vanhegan.net

Reply via email to