--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Justin Zheng <justin.zh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Luke, maybe write a draft CoC that you think should be implemented? ah, thank you: a question. it's very simple: the code of honour (honor if you use U.S.) spelling. it's four lines long: * always do good * never do harm * the code applies 100% of the time * everyone knows the code. that's it. that's all there is to it. it's extremely simple, is rhythmic, both characteristics that make it extremely easy to memorise, and has absolutely nothing that could possibly be toxic about it. there is one "downside" of such a deceptively-simple code: should incidents occur, it requires people to think about what the definitions of "good" and "harm" actually are. ways to "deal" with that are where mistakes get made, in "unpacking" the definitions of "good" (which can never be complete) and "harm", which turn into the most awful and dangerously toxic (and never complete) "proscribed lists of behaviours". thank you for - at last - asking a question. l. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
