I don't know what the accepted solution is, but generally libdrm patches should
go to dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. Since not everyone reads dri-devel
regularly I usually send to both lists. I don't know if it matters much anymore.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:25:12PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> 
> Also, following kernel definition Kabylake is skylake.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> 
>  intel/intel_chipset.h | 57 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/intel/intel_chipset.h b/intel/intel_chipset.h
> index 253ea71..4bbad5c 100644
> --- a/intel/intel_chipset.h
> +++ b/intel/intel_chipset.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,29 @@
>  #define PCI_CHIP_SKYLAKE_SRV_GT1     0x190A
>  #define PCI_CHIP_SKYLAKE_WKS_GT2     0x191D
>  
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT2    0x5916
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT1_5  0x5913
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT1    0x5906
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT3    0x5926
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT2F   0x5921
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULX_GT1_5  0x5915
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULX_GT1    0x590E
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULX_GT2    0x591E
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT2     0x5912

Sweet, the docs have 2 different definitions for 5912. Fantastic.

> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT1_5   0x5917
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT1     0x5902
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT4     0x5932
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT2   0x591B

Again. My goodness, brand strings are going to be a pain.

> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT4   0x593B
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT3   0x592B
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT1   0x590B
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT2    0x591A

Another one.

> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT3    0x592A
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT1    0x590A
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT4    0x593A
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_WKS_GT2    0x591D
> +#define PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_WKS_GT4    0x593D
> +

I suppose given all the duplicates, it might be nice to add comments, but
honestly, nobody really cares about this level of detail in libdrm - and I
missed this when reviewing the mesa patch.

>  #define PCI_CHIP_BROXTON_0           0x0A84
>  #define PCI_CHIP_BROXTON_1           0x1A84
>  #define PCI_CHIP_BROXTON_2           0x5A84
> @@ -362,6 +385,37 @@
>                                (devid) == PCI_CHIP_SKYLAKE_HALO_GT3   || \
>                                (devid) == PCI_CHIP_SKYLAKE_SRV_GT3)
>  
> +#define IS_KBL_GT1(devid)    ((devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT1_5 || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULX_GT1_5 || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT1_5  || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT1   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULX_GT1   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT1    || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT1  || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT1)
> +
> +#define IS_KBL_GT2(devid)    ((devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT2   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT2F  || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULX_GT2   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT2    || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT2  || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT2   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_WKS_GT2)
> +
> +#define IS_KBL_GT3(devid)    ((devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_ULT_GT3   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT3  || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT3)
> +
> +#define IS_KBL_GT4(devid)    ((devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_DT_GT4    || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_HALO_GT4  || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_SRV_GT4   || \
> +                              (devid) == PCI_CHIP_KABYLAKE_WKS_GT4)
> +
> +#define IS_KABYLAKE(devid)   (IS_KBL_GT1(devid) || \
> +                              IS_KBL_GT2(devid) || \
> +                              IS_KBL_GT3(devid) || \
> +                              IS_KBL_GT4(devid))
> +

The actual correct breakdown IMO (and the encoding going back to bdw) is nibble
#1 represents the GT#.

ie
590x = gt1
591x = gt2
592x = gt3
593x = gt4

This doesn't match how it's done here (the fuse parts are rounded down instead
of up, like gt 1.5), but it's up to you.

Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>

>  #define IS_SKYLAKE(devid)    (IS_SKL_GT1(devid) || \
>                                IS_SKL_GT2(devid) || \
>                                IS_SKL_GT3(devid))
> @@ -371,7 +425,8 @@
>                                (devid) == PCI_CHIP_BROXTON_2)
>  
>  #define IS_GEN9(devid)               (IS_SKYLAKE(devid) || \
> -                              IS_BROXTON(devid))
> +                              IS_BROXTON(devid) || \
> +                              IS_KABYLAKE(devid))
>  
>  #define IS_9XX(dev)          (IS_GEN3(dev) || \
>                                IS_GEN4(dev) || \
> -- 
> 2.3.0
> 

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to