On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Iago Toral <ito...@igalia.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 09:53 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 09:21 +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote: >> > Return the number of values written. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <sigles...@igalia.com> >> >> Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> >> >> Are you guys going to split SSBO into their own list? There was talk >> about this recently, but I don't recall what the outcome was. > > I sent RFC patches with a proposal but there hasn't been much discussion > about that yet. Ilia wasn't sure that my proposal was enough. Maybe we > need to wait a bit so he can progress a bit further and confirm/reject > this. Ilia, do you have any new thoughts on this subject?
I'm taking a step back from that work, might take it up again in a week or two. The best way to approach the issue isn't clear in my mind, although I suspect that the UBO/SSBO being in a single list isn't as big of a problem as I originally made it out to be. That said, if it did cause things that weren't loops to become loops, then that'd be unfortunate. -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
