On 13/07/15 16:26, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > > > > Go ahead and make it a cpp file if you have to. > > > > > > Ok, thanks. > > > > > > > Another option would > > > > be to do the map the other way: ir_opcode -> nir_tex_op and refactor > > > > the code to use the nir_tex_op. > > > > > > But even if we do the map in the other way, the helper function > would be > > > using the enum type defined at glsl/ir.h, so we would need to make > it a > > > cpp file in any case. So for now, I will keep things simple, and keep > > > the current mapping, and do the change later. > > > > The difference is that, with the patch I sent a few hours ago, you > only need to do the conversion one place so there's no need for the > helper. > > For whatever it's worth I'm also OK with just duplicating the 10/lines > of code to do the conversion and not bothering with the helper. >
I just realized that today Francisco Jerez mentioned that is working to remove the ir->nir texture op mapping on FS, replacing it with backend instruction opcode: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2015-July/088696.html So probably it would be better to wait for his change, and avoid the need of that mapping on the vec4 path too. That would remove the need of the helper function and the cpp renaming. That sounds ok or should we go on independently of Francisco's work? BR -- Alejandro Piñeiro (apinhe...@igalia.com) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
