On 17 November 2014 21:05, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > - GL extensions > I feel that it's a bit too much to shoot the project down, because it > does not introduce GL extensions that will be useful. To clarify, that's not what I said. It's mostly just that I'd like to see some actual evidence for the (implicit) claim that the performance difference is largely due to inherent OpenGL API overhead.
> Considering the interface note able, would you say that any new > implementation towards handling D3D9 in wine is acceptable ? If anything, it would have to be an interface approximately on the level of the DDI, like Jose mentioned. > Can we work together so that both project benefit from this effort ? I like to think we've always had good relations with Mesa, even if we don't always agree on everything. In this specific case, I'm afraid we just have a pretty fundamental difference of opinion with the st/nine developers on what the right approach is. Feel free to send me an e-mail if you have Wine related questions / requests in any case though. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
