On 17/11/14 20:05, Emil Velikov wrote: > Henri, > > Considering the interface note able, would you say that any new > implementation towards handling D3D9 in wine is acceptable ? Please note > that I'm not talking about improving the existing one be that via GL > extensions or otherwise. > > How about if such an implementation is disabled by default in the build, > and people have to explicitly opt to (via regedit) use it ? A one that > falls back to wine, when it does not work (missing driver or otherwise) > and does not hinder your d3d10/d3d11 efforts ? > > If you're concerned about it's maintenance, I'm pretty sure that one of > the guys can step in. If it's about wine <> mesa(nine) interface I would > assume that the guys would love to hear your feedback (within reason of > course). > > Lastly let's point out that there is a reason why we keep on talking > about this - significant performance improvement [1] [2]. One that > surpasses wine+CSMT and in some cases even the official/binary drivers > on top of it. > In case the above came as me being smart/cocky/disrespectful - it's meant to say (amongst other things): - If there is something we can do to improve things, please keep us in the loop. - People do not know the wine internals as you do, so any feedback and you can provide about a reasonable interface is greatly appreciated. Taking into account the whole "we cannot really export gallium" of course.
Cheers, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
