On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.4.0 -> 10.4.0
Something else that occurred to me -- you want to still make a stable 10.3 release, so 10.3.x will come out after 10.3.99.901? Seems confusing... -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
