On 14/11/14 14:39, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.4.0 -> 10.4.0 > mesa 10.4.1-rc1 -> 10.4.0.901 > ... you get the idea. > > Afaics most freedesktop project use it plus a big hunk of gnome. > > Are there any objections if I move to the above format starting with > mesa 10.4-rc1 ? I would appreciate any feedback over the next 2-3 days, > and based on it I'll tag the first RC. > > The plan is to still keep the branch point later on today, but to push > the tag on Monday. > OK so it seems that we have people concerned that this may cause issues/lack of consistency within mesa, a few people with neutral option and no strong supporters on the topic :'(
The people have spoken - things are staying as is. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
