On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.4.0 -> 10.4.0 > mesa 10.4.1-rc1 -> 10.4.0.901 > ... you get the idea. > > Afaics most freedesktop project use it plus a big hunk of gnome. > > Are there any objections if I move to the above format starting with > mesa 10.4-rc1 ? I would appreciate any feedback over the next 2-3 days, > and based on it I'll tag the first RC.
Huh? What's wrong with the current thing? Can I put in an alternate suggestion of getting the other projects to switch to the mesa (and linux kernel and wine and many many many other projects) rc version naming scheme? -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
