On 04/22/2014 12:19 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:34:37PM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Sarah Sharp >> <sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com>wrote: >> >>> Chromium defined a new GL extension (that isn't registered with Khronos). >>> >> >> This here is the problem IMO. I'll see next week what we can do about >> pushing for this to become a registered extension. Intel would be our 2nd >> implementation, so I think we have enough support at this point. > > Sure. How long does getting an extension registered take? Should I > hold off on this patch until it lands, or should we just remove the EGL > definition from eglmesaext.h once it gets imported into eglext.h?
Once the extension is submitted, it /usually/ only takes a couple days. But there is always some probability that you can flip a coin infinite number of times and get all heads. :) > Sarah Sharp _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
