It sounds good, but I'd like the prefix to be si_ everywhere. Marek
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Andreas Hartmetz <ahartm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > many of the files in radeonsi originally came from other places where > they had different names and were never renamed. > Most of them now have names that don't tell what the files are for > (r600 is not actually the first hardware supported by them, they start > at radeonsi), and even those with radeonsi are split between > radeonsi_ and si_. > si_ is shorter than radeonsi_, but inconsistent with the directory and > library name. I still think it's the best option, but no strong opinion > from me. If and when the files are renamed, the next step would be > doing the same with the r600_ struct and function names. > Does that sound good? I'll send the patches shortly if so. > > Cheers, > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
