On 10/30/2013 02:16 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
On 30 October 2013 14:13, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
On 10/30/2013 01:01 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork
point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or
something similair. How do people feel about that?
I support this idea.
To avoid confusion with tags on the branch, I think the tag should
reflect where master is going. mesa-10.next? mesa-10.1-devel? I'm
open to suggestions. I'll update the version with the first patch after
the tag.
I like the sound of mesa-10.1-devel.
Me too. I like mesa-10.1-devel.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
