For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or something similair. How do people feel about that?
It's been a long time since git-describe has given useful info. It's reported snb-magic for a looooooooong time. $ git-describe snb-magic-18845-g103824d _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
