On 30 October 2013 14:13, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > On 10/30/2013 01:01 PM, Chad Versace wrote: > > For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork > > point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or > > something similair. How do people feel about that? > > I support this idea. > > To avoid confusion with tags on the branch, I think the tag should > reflect where master is going. mesa-10.next? mesa-10.1-devel? I'm > open to suggestions. I'll update the version with the first patch after > the tag. >
I like the sound of mesa-10.1-devel.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
