On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:19:12AM -0700, Chad Versace wrote: > On 07/19/2013 09:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 02:03:31PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:00:59PM -0700, Chad Versace wrote: > >>>Change from "not cacheable" to "cacheable" in L3. > >>>Do so for the draw upload path and blorp. > >> > >>I just tested using mocs on the scanout for Haswell and you do get > >>blatant cache dirt. This is probably only a minor worry for mesa, but it > >>is worth a comment for somebody who sees the dirt to try and rectify. > > I was unable to see the scanout cache dirt with my experiment, so I conclude > that my > experiment wasn't stringent enough. Explain how your experiment, so I can use > your > method going forward.
I turned it on in the ddx and used a bare X session. That way I knew I would end up rendering onto the scanout. The dirt was easy to see in firefox. Sad, because it did give a nice boost to performance. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
