On 8 April 2013 09:41, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > Paul Berry <stereotype...@gmail.com> writes: > > > This patch moves the following data structures from vec4_visitor to > > vec4_vs_visitor, since they contain VS-specific data: > > > > - struct brw_vs_compile *c > > - struct brw_vs_prog_data *prog_data > > - src_reg *vp_temp_regs > > - src_reg vp_addr_reg > > > > Since brw_vs_compile and brw_vs_prog_data also contain vec4-generic > > data, the following pointers are added to the base class, to allow it > > to access the vec4-generic portions of these data structures: > > > > - struct brw_vec4_compile *vec4_compile > > - struct brw_vec4_prog_key *vec4_key > > - struct brw_vec4_prog_data *vec4_prog_data > > I would lean toward the base class (which contains most of the members > and usages, I think) having the short name, and the derived class having > the more specific name.
Sure, I can go along with that.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
