On Mit, 2013-02-20 at 17:56 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Don, 2013-02-14 at 11:32 +0100, Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.02.2013 18:22, schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > > On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 18:17 +0100, Christian König wrote: > > >> Am 13.02.2013 18:11, schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > >>> On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 11:34 -0500, Tom Stellard wrote: > > >>>> There's just the one cleanup on patch 10 that you mentioned, but > > >>>> otherwise the series looks good to me. Should we mark all these > > >>>> patches > > >>>> as candidates for the stable branch? > > >>> I think so, at least the parts which prevent things such as Vincent's > > >>> MAD changes or switching to the Source scheduler from breaking stuff. > > >> I still have no idea why the MAD change actually breaks anything. I'm > > >> working on OMOD/ABS/NEG folding in another branch and have Vincents MAD > > >> in there, but I haven't had time to fully figure out what's wrong there. > > >> And unfortunately I don't think I will have time in the near future. > > > Well, as I said, his MAD changes no longer break after this series. Does > > > anything speak against backporting the whole series to the stable tree? > > > > Oh, didn't know that I actually had fixed the bug that made MAD break, > > good to know. > > Actually, today I'm seeing the MAD changes breaking some piglit tests > again even with your changes.
Never mind, your cndlt fix takes care of it. Let's hope for good this time. :) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
