On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 18:17 +0100, Christian König wrote: > Am 13.02.2013 18:11, schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 11:34 -0500, Tom Stellard wrote: > >> There's just the one cleanup on patch 10 that you mentioned, but > >> otherwise the series looks good to me. Should we mark all these patches > >> as candidates for the stable branch? > > I think so, at least the parts which prevent things such as Vincent's > > MAD changes or switching to the Source scheduler from breaking stuff. > > I still have no idea why the MAD change actually breaks anything. I'm > working on OMOD/ABS/NEG folding in another branch and have Vincents MAD > in there, but I haven't had time to fully figure out what's wrong there. > And unfortunately I don't think I will have time in the near future.
Well, as I said, his MAD changes no longer break after this series. Does anything speak against backporting the whole series to the stable tree? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
