Am 13.02.2013 18:22, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 18:17 +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.02.2013 18:11, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 11:34 -0500, Tom Stellard wrote:
There's just the one cleanup on patch 10 that you mentioned, but
otherwise the series looks good to me. Should we mark all these patches
as candidates for the stable branch?
I think so, at least the parts which prevent things such as Vincent's
MAD changes or switching to the Source scheduler from breaking stuff.
I still have no idea why the MAD change actually breaks anything. I'm
working on OMOD/ABS/NEG folding in another branch and have Vincents MAD
in there, but I haven't had time to fully figure out what's wrong there.
And unfortunately I don't think I will have time in the near future.
Well, as I said, his MAD changes no longer break after this series. Does
anything speak against backporting the whole series to the stable tree?
Oh, didn't know that I actually had fixed the bug that made MAD break,
good to know.
Well it's quite a change, but applying it to stable as well sounds
logical to me and I don't see any reason why we should do so.
Sending out V2 of the patchset out in the next few moments. Can you push
that to llvm master ? I still don't have requested commit rights there.
Christian.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
