Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> writes: > Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> writes: >> These tests intermittently pass / fail for me for quite some time (since >> always?). > > Oh, well in that case I feel better about my patch series. > > We should come up with a better plan for unreliable tests in piglit. It > seems that the current approach is developing human filters to ignore > unreliable test results. That's obviously fragile in lots of ways, (and > especially painful for new users with no filters in place). > > How about moving tests that like these that are known to misbehave out > of all.tests and into something like unreliable.tests? Or just removing > them, leaving them just in the git history?
That would be a great way to never fix problems. I propose instead that people bothered failures go debug them.
pgpqxaVAjkh9O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
