The order shouldn't matter, but there can be a reason behind it, e.g. if a shader depends on the update of the following shader.
Marek On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:19 PM Lepton Wu <lep...@chromium.org> wrote: > In src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_list.h, > > Now it's this order: > > ST_STATE(ST_NEW_FS_STATE, st_update_fp) > ST_STATE(ST_NEW_GS_STATE, st_update_gp) > ST_STATE(ST_NEW_TES_STATE, st_update_tep) > ST_STATE(ST_NEW_TCS_STATE, st_update_tcp) > ST_STATE(ST_NEW_VS_STATE, st_update_vp) > > While code in > src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom.c: > > while (dirty_lo) > update_functions[u_bit_scan(&dirty_lo)](st); > > That means if will call st_update_fp first and then st_update_gp... etc. > > But this is inconsistent with opengl pipeline: should we reverse the > order here or I missed something? > > Background: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/virgl/virglrenderer/issues/114 > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
