On 2018-06-15 05:25 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On June 15, 2018 01:14:24 Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >> On 2018-06-15 07:31 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: >>> >>> I did some testing and x11perf -copywinwin500 is... exactly the same >>> with >>> or without my patches. If anything they might improve it by just a >>> hair. >> >> Possible explanations I can think of: >> >> 1. Your glamor still has its own FBO cache. Which version of xserver are >> you testing with? >> > 1.19 I think
Okay, that doesn't have the glamor FBO cache anymore. >> 2. The i965 driver cache isn't hit even before these changes. > > It's definitely getting hit in both cases, it just may require a > slightly larger cache of we aren't recycling BOs until they're idle. It might be more than just slightly, -copywinwin500 can queue many overlapping copies between flushes. Can you compare the maximum total cache size with and without this series? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
