so the gll is ok? my idea with the glc is that this particular extension would no longer be advertised as soon as the app request a context where the functionality is already part of it (ie OpenGL >= 4.0)
Do you think a minimum GLSL version could be added to this table (maybe replacing the year) so that GLSL version overriding has a similar effect? Am 18.05.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Ilia Mirkin: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Benedikt Schemmer <b...@besd.de> wrote: >> Am I on the right track to assume that Timothy's patch should read >> >> +EXT(ARB_gpu_shader5 , ARB_gpu_shader5 >> , 32, 40, x , x , 2010) >> >> to give GL_ARB_gpu_shader5 a minimum required legacy OpenGL version of 3.2 >> and core 4.0 as per spec? > > It should read something like 32, 32. I was going to point that out, > but ... meh. It shouldn't matter in practice. Environment > variable-based overrides aren't a particularly supported mode of > operation, so I don't think we need to bend over backwards for it. > > -ilia > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
