On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:29:43 -0800, Paul Berry <stereotype...@gmail.com> wrote: > At this point I'm tempted to drop this patch entirely (and the idea of > precomputing the VUE map), and instead have brw_vs_prog store the VUE map > in brw->vs.prog_data, where gen{6,7}_sf_state.c can examine it later. This > would be safe, since for obvious reasons gen{6,7}_sf_state already depends > on CACHE_NEW_VS_PROG. That would neatly address all the concerns we've > been talking about in this thread.
Agreed!
pgpZkIA6TzvVP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev