On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:29:43 -0800, Paul Berry <stereotype...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At this point I'm tempted to drop this patch entirely (and the idea of
> precomputing the VUE map), and instead have brw_vs_prog store the VUE map
> in brw->vs.prog_data, where gen{6,7}_sf_state.c can examine it later.  This
> would be safe, since for obvious reasons gen{6,7}_sf_state already depends
> on CACHE_NEW_VS_PROG.  That would neatly address all the concerns we've
> been talking about in this thread.

Agreed!

Attachment: pgpZkIA6TzvVP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to