On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going >> to land in master first, they shouldn't send it to the stable ML, >> because that is redundant. Yet, many people do that. I would go even >> further and say that any unreviewed patches shouldn't be sent to the >> stable ML. At least that would be my policy I were the release >> manager. >> > Since I'm no longer tracking nominated-but-not-merged-in-master > patches things are noticeably better.
What about patches in mesa-stable that can't be merged to master, because master needs to be fixed differently? Will you then apply the patches from mesa-stable or ignore them? Based on experience, it looks like you ignore them completely, which is why many fixes that I sent for inclusion to stable branches only (not master) have never been applied. This process needs to be fixed. Marek _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
