On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going > to land in master first, they shouldn't send it to the stable ML, > because that is redundant. Yet, many people do that. I would go even > further and say that any unreviewed patches shouldn't be sent to the > stable ML. At least that would be my policy I were the release > manager. > Since I'm no longer tracking nominated-but-not-merged-in-master patches things are noticeably better.
Fwiw the official policy has been to not merge patches without review. I've bent that rule (and others) on a number of occasions for pretty much everyone. I hope that doesn't happen again, but in all fairness it will. Otherwise we'll get a lot of upset/angry/alienated developers. > I don't know how Emil manages that ML, but I guess it's not fun. > it's "less fun" when one uses a unofficial way to nominate patches - hint, hint. Again it's my fault for not having things in a clearer and easier to parse/understand way. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
