On 15/06/16 18:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 15 June 2016 at 15:58, Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com> wrote:
Why is this change needed? Does some compiler balk at 1.f?
Since I'm the one 'to blame' for these patches I'll answer - consistency.
These are the only remaining cases where the trailing zero was missing :-)
-Emil
Although I'm not one of them myself, some people prefer the short ".f"
instead of ".0f". So, unless we all plant to make a point out of
avoiding ".f" when writing new code, and call it out on patch reviews,
this consistency will be short lived.
That is, I think that attempts to standardize minor cosmetic issues is a
distraction.
I mean, we can't even standardize on major cosmetic things like
indentation across whole Mesa, and we have such a high level of review
request traffic already.
My 2c.
Jose
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
