On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> Both for this and the previous patch, should we start advertising the >> relevant EGL extensions as well? Or would that take more effort than >> just not returning errors for them? > > That is what patch 5 does. It seems to work just advertising the extensions.
Patch 5 just adds those enums somewhere. I meant something like _eglCreateExtensionsString which would expose the relevant extensions as supported. -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev