On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> Both for this and the previous patch, should we start advertising the
>> relevant EGL extensions as well? Or would that take more effort than
>> just not returning errors for them?
>
> That is what patch 5 does. It seems to work just advertising the extensions.

Patch 5 just adds those enums somewhere. I meant something like
_eglCreateExtensionsString which would expose the relevant extensions
as supported.

  -ilia
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to