On 22.09.2010 23:03, Ian Romanick wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: >> So Evergreen hardware appears to have only completely separate depth >> and stencil buffers and doesn't natively support a combnined DS buffer >> from what I can see. I'm awaiting clarification from AMD. > >> Now gallium and st/mesa seem to be quite dedicated to the whole >> combined DS cause. > >> I'm mainly posting just wondering if anyone else has considered this >> or any other hardware this might be useful for exists, or if anyone >> can speak to the pitfalls I'll face. > > Since separate depth / stencil is a required feature in some late > version of DX (11?), you can be sure that it will start appearing in > other hardware over the next year or so.
Where did you see that? I don't really see separate depth/stencil buffers in d3d11. What is new in d3d11 are flags to mark either the depth or stencil portion in a depthstencil buffer as read only, but the view is still combined. These new flags say "Limiting a depth-stencil buffer to read-only access allows more than one depth-stencil view to be bound to the pipeline simultaneously, since it is not possible to have a read/write conflicts between separate views." But the buffers are still combined (and I can't see how you could actually do what is stated there as OMSetRenderTargets still only takes one dsv but I'm probably missing something). Also, even in d3d10, you had formats which only have stencil (s8) or z. But you can't set two of them simultaneously (with OMSetRenderTargets), so you will have either no stencil buffer or no depth buffer when you use them - that can technically still be described as a combined buffer. So I think Keith is right - d3d10/11 doesn't care if these are physically separate or not. Roland _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
