-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 José Fonseca wrote:
> OK. > > What about this: > > For GLUT, GLEW, LLVM and all other dependencies I'll just make a SDK > with the binaries, with debug & release, 32 & 64 bit, MinGW & MSVC > versions. One seldom needs to modify the source anyway, and they have > active upstream development. > > But I perceive talloc as different from all above: it's very low level > and low weight library, providing very basic functionality, and upstream > never showed interest for Windows portability. I'd really prefer to see > the talloc source bundled (and only compiled on windows), as a quick way > to have glsl2 merged without causing windows build failures. This seems like a reasonable compromise. Is this something that you and / or Aras can tackle? I don't have a Windows build system set up, so I wouldn't be able to test any build system changes that I made. > (Hopefully in the future we could have jakob Bornecrantz or Aras > Pranckevičius re-implement a BSD-like version of it, and therefore > eliminating all the different licensing concerns.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxka5oACgkQX1gOwKyEAw9O9gCfRoQ6KlNNJBZRiEkPVrqFlGI1 eHwAoI5YK1XhYy0zJqSraaxAXTWK/HDs =RUOc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
