Sean's first line: "A focus on GDP and national accounts gives a misleading picture of US economic power."

Both Sean and Michael Roberts are superb at tracking profits. That's only a rough proxy for surplus value extraction, of course. There are so many ways - IP control, marketing, financing, etc - Apple takes vast surpluses out of not only China but from the other lands where /raw materials /are drawn from in which there is accumulation not by exploitation (that's Foxconn's job) but by dispossession.

    But Sean and Michael have not yet built into their framing the 'unequal ecological exchange' associated with depleted natural resource wealth, greenhouse gas emissions and local pollution - none of which the original framers of GDP (Kuznets et al) cared about (nor women's unpaid labour in social reproduction).

    Nor is the damage represented by child labour in the Chinese-run Eastern DRC mines, supported by SA and other UN 'peacekeeping' soldiers until they were overrun in Goma last month, counted in GDP.

    Which in turn means that the /sub-imperialist /components of global value chains are not being taken seriously enough: Chinese extraction, South African protection, etc. The same occurs all over Africa. Most reformers of mining - the 'resource nationalists' and African Mining Vision proponents - make the same mistake by, in Samir Amin's words, 'passing an eraser' over resource depletion, emissions, pollution and social reproduction.

    More: https://www.cadtm.org/Pitfalls-of-resource-national-consciousness



On 2/24/2025 4:48 PM, Marv Gandall via groups.io wrote:

[Edited Message Follows]
[Reason: Editorial]

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 06:50 PM, Charles wrote:

    Roberts and Starrs bloviate about foreign companies in China and
    their exports...China's exports are a decreasing portion of its
    economy...When it comes to the position of China's state and
    private capitalists in the world economy, Gandall, Starrs, and
    Roberts are basically blowing smoke.

Starrs and Roberts both measure the economic strength of countries by the *profit share* of their trans national corporations operating abroad. By this measure, the US is by far the dominant economic power. Starrs finds the profit share of US corporations leading in 19 of 25 global industries and well ahead in 13 of them, a measure which has remained fairly steady over the past two decades. Charlie's preferred measure of economic strength appears to be the *export intensity *of countries which does not distinguish between the dollar share of their domestic exporters and that of foreign corporations operating on their territory. By this measure, Charlie shows the US lagging far behind its rivals in Germany, China, and the EU. It is also unclear what Charlie means when he accuses Starrs and Roberts of "biovating" and "blowing smoke" about Chinese state-owned and private enterprises. It is true that they are not as impressed with the  overseas performance of Chinese firms relative to US capital as are Charlie and others who theorize about Chinese "imperialism" as a major threat to US hegemony.  Starrs' data shows Chinese TNC's as the most profitable in only four global industries, well behind the US multinationals. Within China, they account for only 30% of the country's key exports, again well behind their US, Asian, and European rivals who use China as an export platform. So Sartesian is again correct in asking Charlie:  "What is the context behind your "snippets”? What exactly is your point? The US is/is not being eclipsed by China?  China is/is not emerging as a new hegemon?"





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#35437): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35437
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111336789/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to