Better case would be to automatically discover that a TLD is bad but also
provide for the possibility that a given domain in the TLD is fine using a
reputation based system.

Of course, then there's the "automatically know what the TLD is" problem
since it's not just the last segment.

And having enough traffic to be able to learn and a way for some mail to
get through so that you can learn the "good" domains.

And then have people complain that the free not-quite TLD they use is
labeled as bad and they get caught up in it because they don't have enough
traffic to be labeled as good.

Anyways, if your traders don't get the email updates from abc.xyz because
you blocked the entire TLD, they'll probably get annoyed... and if enough
money was involved, you may
lose your job.  Which is to say, how you handle these things have more to
do with the level of effort you're willing to put in for the payoff and
what your customers require.

As a sender, you may want to avoid these instead of trying to work around
the implicit penalty.

Brandon

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:02 PM Michael Rathbun via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:44:50 +0800, Jeff Pang via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org>
> wrote:
>
> >Is there domain name discrimination in the email industry? For example,
> >com, net, and org are considered to have higher reputations, while info,
> >xyz, and top are considered to have lower ratings. The latter do attract
> >a lot of spam because they are cheaper in the first year. Will this
> >lower the ratings of these domain names?
>
> Sometimes, if you happen to note that 97.6% of ".xyz" traffic is spam, you
> hear a "sproing!" that tells you that you can cut your overall costs by
> sending those items to the gravel pit with a "22 out of 7.5" spam rating.
>
> mdr
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to