It appears that Scott Mutter via mailop <mailopl...@amssupport.info> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 7:54 AM Alessandro Vesely via mailop < >In my opinion this is where the industry could use some oversight. As you >say there is nothing to stop a large operator from blocking a small >operator simply because they can. ...
You really REALLY do not want to go there. There are a lot of spammers who send mail that is 100% CAN-SPAM compliant. (It's not hard.) If a big mailer has to deliver your mail, why don't they have to deliver the spammer's mail, too? Apropos of Anne's comment, the CDA says providers can block material they consider "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable." Courts have repeatedly found that otherwise objectionable includes spam filtering. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
