Yes, keep the plain text alternative -- I need it to be accessible and plain text is better that way. If you need to have a link or two, just paste them in there, but the html mail is usually totally unnecessary anyway, this is Email after all and it was not designed for html. It seems much safer to me as well, no beacons or anything like that in a plain text email.
On Mon, 09 Dec 2019 03:50:14 -0500, Maarten Oelering via mailop wrote: > > Multipart messages with html and text alternatives are generally considered > best practice. Senders with html templates should add a text version is the > common believe. > > But it's almost 2020, and we were wondering if there's still a good reason > for adding plain text to a html message. Is there a significant audience > reading in plain text? Is plain text important for accessibility? Because > SpamAssassin says so? > > Would be great to get feedback from this diverse and knowledgable community. > > Thanks, > Maarten Oelering > Postmastery > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
