On 1/10/2019 12:00 PM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
> At the very least, it is a suspicious practice. And certain people
> high up in the industry have strongly warned me against ever doing
> ANYTHING like that
Clearly that is a stated "dislike" of an entity's practice.
Your PREVIOUS use of the word "dislike" implied that my opinions about a
particular entity were biased an based upon my allegedly "disliking" a
particular entity (not disliking their practices, disliking THEM). And
it implied that my opinions about your opinions were biased by that
dislike. At least, that is the way I interpreted your comment below.
Yes, I disliked this one practice of theirs (referring to multiple orgs
here), but not because I dislike them, nor was my alleged "dislike" of
them (which isn't actually the case - I don't have enough info on "them"
to form such an opinion) any kind of basis for disliking this one
particular practice. There is even a possibility that I could "like"
them overall, but STILL "dislike" this practice.
For context, here is your previous comment, to which I had responded:
O
n 1/10/2019 10:44 AM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
You are de-valuing mine, strictly
because I have a biz agreement with some entity you dislike.
Given your later response - I think we can safely attribute this to a
misunderstanding - that you later clarified. And hopefully this will
help you understand why I responded the way I did.
--
Rob McEwen
https://www.invaluement.com
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
