On 1/10/2019 9:33 AM, Rob McEwen wrote:
is basically to say, "but how do you know for sure that the person
isn't giving in to competing interests or is compromised? and how dare
you question their judgment!" (to summarize your arguments)
oops - "double negative" typo - I meant to say:
is basically to say, "but how do you know for sure that the person *is*
giving in to competing interests or is compromised? and how dare you
question their judgment!" (to summarize your arguments)
--
Rob McEwen
https://www.invaluement.com
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
