On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 at 16:47, Jim Popovitch via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 10:27 -0400, Rob McEwen wrote: > > there has to be some justified level of "collateral damage" these > > days, due to the very high frequency of hijacked accounts, hijacked > > websites, and spamming ESP customers (from ESP that are overall > > good). > > Rather than dumping a piece of technology (ipv6), dump the ESPs that > enable cheap sending. (Win! Win!). If those ESP customers had to build > out their own infrastructure then they would take better care of it... > regardless of ipv4, ipv6, ipv8, etc.
If you really think that rejecting email from senders that want to optimize their costs is a good strategy.... Well, IPv6 is simply a way to make email sending cheaper. So not supporting Ipv6 is an effective way to dump cheap sending. I guess anyone with a good corpus can easily check that "inexpensive ESP" are not more spammy than "fortune 500 ESP". Someone proposed to simply add some cost to every SMTP transaction as a way to stop the spam, some blacklist offer paid unlisting services, too... but spammers sometimes have more money to send email than the average user IMHO. Stefano _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
