Rob McEwen wrote:
But, otherwise, I'm having a hard time working up the motivation to
spend any more time trying change your mind about those things I said
with which you disagreed--because the world would be a worse place if
SORBS tried to be an invaluement clone, AND a worse place if
invaluement tried to be a SORBS clone.
Not suggesting that it should be in anyway what so ever.... Not quite
sure where you got the thought that I might have suggested it... I was
deliberately trying to generalise and keep naming names to a minimum
(and you'll note that *none* of my comments were actually directed at
invaluement - they were all comments surrounding those directly
mentioned but hopefully generalised enough that fingers were not pointed
where there was something lacking.)
Regards,
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
