On 8/29/2016 9:58 AM, Eric Henson wrote:
don’t have false positives: Barracuda RBL

Barracuda's RBL is a very good list... for high scoring... or for outright blocking for somewhat small hosters. But if an ISP or hoster has more than several thousand mailboxes AND is even moderately concerned about FPs, they would probably be happier using Barracuda's RBL for high scoring, and not for outright blocking.

Having said that... the age of high quality, virtually-zero FPs... is OVER!

Why? Because compromised mail accounts and hijacked web servers have both become a MASSIVE EPIDEMIC in the past few years.

For this reason, I regularly encounter hand-typed legit messages blocked by even SpamHaus's Zen list--yet Zen continues to be the best blacklist. In pretty much all such cases, those Zen "false positives" (if you can even call them that?) were situations where a small-ish legit sender had a compromised account that was spewing out much spam, and the ratio of spam/ham made the collateral damage very justifiable--and usually the blacklisting is short lived, keeping collateral damage to a minimum.

What separates the men from the boys here is NOT which list has zero FPs... but instead... which keeps such collateral damage to a minimum, via making good judgements about the ratio of spam blocked vs. resulting collateral damage--and keeping such listings short-lived, yet WITHOUT giving deliberate snowshoe spammers easy-off mechanisms, or too-short expire times.

By this very measure, Barracuda's RBL is a great list, but still not nearly as good as Zen, and probably too risky for outright blocking by larger senders.

And the absolutely zero FP blacklist is now a mythical creature... more sys admins in the e-mail industry need to recognize that and recognize that an RBL occasionally blocking a relatively few legit messages of a compromised sender (as Zen does!) can be a very GOOD thing (as long as there is a good balance--unfortunately, unlike Zen, some don't quite achieve the best balance!).

Such minimal and well-justified "collateral damage" does much to motivate system administrators to clean up their mess and implement better procedures to prevent (or more quickly mitigate) compromised accounts and other exploits.

--
Rob McEwen


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to