> using Barracuda's RBL for high scoring, and not for outright blocking.
I think that in this day and age, this is true for *any* list - black-, white-, reputation- (yes, even ours). Whitelists can also have false positives - even pay for play ones, because while full-on spammers may not pay to be on a whitelist, or for reputation certification, etc...., organizations that are whitehat can experience personnel changes in their email and marketing departments, and an organization can go from blindingly white to a shade of grey overnight. Plus, even more now than ever, what one receiving system may think of as 'spam' another may think of as 'legitimate email our users just didn't know they wanted'. In fact, that's why we take pains to make a point that our lists are *not* whitelists - they are lists where receivers can get information about the specific practices of the senders - so, like Rob said - use them for scoring, not for outright blocking (well, accepting, in our case). Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Legislative Consultant CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Member, California Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Member, Colorado Cybersecurity Consortium Member, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose Ret. Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop amitch...@isipp.com | @AnnePMitchell Facebook/AnnePMitchell | LinkedIn/in/annemitchell _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
