I was told that there were agreements in place.
But yes, it's a race. If it were up to me, IPv4 would be reserved for services, and all end user customer traffic would move to IPv6. But that's just my own pet thoughts on the matter, and does not in any way reflect Microsoft policy. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? -----Original Message----- From: David Conrad [mailto:d...@virtualized.org] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 4:30 PM To: Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> Cc: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] 'x-originating-ip' is [25.162.68.132] ? Hi, On Jul 15, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Michael Wise via mailop <mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote: > Every so often we need to (re-)?explain this. > That block, 25/8, is not in fact announced by anyone. Perhaps not right now... > Not the UK Ministry of Defense. > Not Microsoft. > Not Nobody. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32826353. Yes, I'm aware that is a different /8 held by HMG, however, given the lack of supply and the increasing demand for IPv4 addresses, it is most likely not particularly prudent to assume any IPv4 block (or part of a block) will not be announced at some point in the future (particularly a block held by a government, given their interests is increasing revenues without raising taxes). > But reconfiguring 16,222,216 network devices takes time. > The solution, of course, is IPv6. It's a race! Regards, -drc (speaking only for myself)
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
